Freedom of Speech Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

The right to speak freely of Speech - Essay Example Given that Hustler guards male predominance in sexual issues one can presume that Hustler damages and subordinates ladies. Then again, this magazine has additionally a negative meaning for men advancing their sexual coarseness and tendency towards brutality against ladies. Subsequently, this prompts the combination of the male control in the public eye that adversely influences the connection among people. In this regard, the legitimate guideline of sex entertainment may lessen the negative effect of erotic entertainment on society. Catharine MacKinnon would highlight the way that sex entertainment is corrupt marvel, which abuses the standards of sexual orientation equity and is in this manner an immediate danger to the status of ladies in the public arena. One can assume that the right to speak freely of discourse may reinforce these propensities in the general public, as it will advance the possibility that men reserve an option to sexual predominance over ladies including the utilization of

Case 3: the O-Fold Innovation for Preventing Wrinkles

Case 3: The O-Fold Innovation for Preventing Wrinkles The O-Fold Innovation for Preventing Wrinkles: A Good Business Opportunity 1. Select which plan of action Alex should seek after and protect your answer. I decide for Alex to seek after the plan of action which utilizes the Crawl-Walk-Run Strategy. With this methodology, he can really use a portion of the parts of different procedures to work and benefit from his business thought. The Crawl-Walk-Run methodology has a three stage procedure of growing an organization. The primary expression is the creep stage in which Alex and his sibling can create the O-Folds themselves. They can advertise and appropriate them locally, on the web or entryway to-entryway. He can assemble some market information to back up his business thought and furthermore figure out things to expect when firing up a private company. This additionally will help with getting heavenly attendant speculators to jump aboard which will start in the following stage. The walk stage is testing out the plan to holy messenger financial specialists, have a patent, a created dispersion channel and a promoting methodology. This may give a leave procedure to financial specialists and furthermore for different organizations to need to purchase the O-Fold. The run stage would be the stage that Alex chooses to proceed with the organization or sell his enthusiasm for the organization. He additionally now would need to deliver enormous amounts. This system will permit Alex to settle on choices at any of the three stages and he would need to confine himself to just one. 2. Play out a SWOT examination for the plan of action you chose. The accompanying SWOT investigation catches a portion of the key components that may fortify or prevent the advancement of O-Fold: Strengths Innovative and useful structure; light weight and simple to convey †¢ With the expansion in aircraft cost and the expense of gear, having a portable that is roomy and advantageous can work. Shortcomings †¢ The organization and item is new and doesn’t have the reliable capital required. Openings †¢ The item is moderately new to the market. †¢ There is an abundance of untargeted customers and business openings. Dangers †¢ Established, bigger, increasingly experienced organizations that have just caught the business target advertise. Is the objective market considerable enough to make a benefit? 3. As a piece of the supervisory group, how might you handle conveyance and advertising of the O-Fold? As an individual from the Management group, I would begin conveying locally. Going way to-entryway to nearby inhabitants; addressing neighborhood gear stores; set up a site and sell some there; place promotions in the neighborhood paper. When enough income comes in then we can promote in touring publications; aircraft inventories and on carrier sites. Another conceivable recommendation is open a little store at the air terminal where we can have our objective market directly at our discoverer tips. 4. What is the leave system for your chosen plan of action, to what extent will it take you, and what key focuses will flag an opportunity to exit? As a piece of the supervisory group, I would recommend that between 4 to 5 years or once there are new participants to the market, Alex should sell his advantage and permit another progressively experienced organization to obtain the organization. 5. Research on your own how heavenly attendant contributing arrangements are planned. At that point layout and guard the highlights of the arrangement that you would pitch to speculators (reserves gave, financing cost, value, and so on ) The result of O-Fold is an imaginative structure that can be helpful for business proficient during their movement. It is additionally made for any individual who experiences experienced issues with wrinkles while voyaging. Our methodology is engaged separated with a cost that is very good quality. We accept that by year 5, financing cost can be about 6%; an arrival on value of about 10% and income of averaging $100K. 6. At what focuses ought to Alex think about welcoming on extra administration? What positions would it be a good idea for him to take care of and in what request? Shield your answer. Alex ought to welcome on extra administration at the Walk stage. He is going to require a legal advisor; a bookkeeper; a showcasing director and a get together supervisor. At this stage, he can survey the advancement of the organization and choose if he needs to proceed with building the organization or exit. His supervisory crew can likewise manage him in settling on those critical choices. 7. What are some estimating methodologies you would consider using so as to get the O-Fold to advertise? Do you concur with Alex’s valuing point? I accept that O-Fold ought to be an extravagance line and the cost ought to be sensibly high. I state this in light of the fact that the objective market would be business experts and people who might require their clothing to be wrinkled free. I do accept that Alex’s valuing point is sensible and can give him a gainful edge in the event that he is providing food for a more extensive scope of the market focus to incorporate fundamentally everybody that movements. Reference: Thompson, A. , et al (2010). Making and Executing Strategy: The Quest for upper hand (eighth ed. ). McGraw-Hill Irwin

I am a bachelor of science and a master of engineering.

I am a bachelor of science and a master of engineering. My thesis is done. It is 384 pages long, 2.0833% of them text, 4.9479% of them pictures, and 90.365% of them code.         Here is potato soup, made and dictated by Cory and based heavily on this soup recipe. Potato Soup Chop four carrots, three or four stalks of celery, an onion, three or four large potatoes, and one leftover pork chop (or whatever). Put them all in a pot except for the potatoes, cook for two minutes without broth, add the potatoes, and cook five more minutes without broth.         Add broth (any broth; we used chicken stock). Simmer ten minutes or so until the potatoes are soft. Whisk together three tablespoons of flour and one cup of milk and stir it into the soup. Cook five more minutes.   Let the soup cool enough that it is safe to handle. Food process half of it and put it back. Add one cup of half-and-half or a half-cup of cream. Stir the soup, bring it back to a boil, and season to taste.     Garnish with shredded cheese (muenster is my preferred) and parsley. Our parsley came from our tabletop garden, which is made of starters from Paula J. ‘14’s house garden and which so far only Cory waters. There is something very, very satisfying in garnishing soup with plants from your own garden.

The Heemer Essay examples - 708 Words

Hotel Rwanda Essay From the beginning of AP World to the end, we have been using the 5 basic themes of AP World. Theme 1 is Interaction Between Humans and the Environment. Theme 2 is Development and Interaction of Cultures. Theme 3 is State-Building, Expansion and Conflict. Theme 4 is Creation, Expansion and Interaction of Economic Systems. Theme 5 is Development and Transformation of Social Structures. All of these themes apply in the movie Hotel Rwanda. Hotel Rwanda portrays how the Rwandan Civil War went down and how the Milles Collines helped save many Hutus from being killed by the Tutsi. Theme 1 which is Interaction Between Humans and the Environment applies in the movie. Theme 1 means the development of demography, disease,†¦show more content†¦They were going to get revenge, one way or another. Theme 4 is Creation, Expansion and Interaction of Economic Systems which means the creation of agricultural and pastoral production, trade, labor systems, industrialization etc. In the beginning of the movie, the Hutus were controlling the Tutsis and made them work under them. But once the revolt began, the Hutus were either being killed or had to be a slave for the Tutsis. Theme 5 is Development and Transformation of Social Structures, which means the development of gender roles, family and kinship, racial and ethic constructions and social and economic classes. In the movie, the social status of the Tutsis were basically slaves. They were the under dogs and were treated less than the Hutus. The development of the Tutsis began throughout the movie, from the under dogs, being controlled to controlling the Hutus and being above them. The main causes of the Rwandan Civil War were the horrible living conditions, the UN not really caring about the violence in Rwanda and the Hutus treating the Tutsis like slaves and not treating them as equals. There are many things that could have been done to prevent the civil war. First is the UN. They should have taken a bigger charge and s hould have done their best to stop all violence. Also, they could of helped with the tough economic times. This would have kept the Tutsis mine off revenge and possibly

A Summary of Durkheims Division of Labor in Society

French philosopher Emile Durkheims book The Division of Labor in Society (or De la Division du Travail Social) debuted in 1893. It was Durkheim’s first major published work, and it is the one in which he introduced the concept of anomie or the breakdown of the influence of social norms on individuals within a society. At the time, The Division of Labor in Society was influential in advancing sociological theories and thought. Major Themes Durkheim discusses how the division of labor—the establishment of specified jobs for specific people—benefits society because it increases the reproductive capacity of a process and the skill set of the workers. It also creates a feeling of solidarity among people who share those jobs. But, Durkheim says, the division of labor goes beyond economic interests: In the process, it also establishes social and moral order within a society. The division of labor can be effectuated only among members of an already constituted society, he argues. To Durkheim, the division of labor is in direct proportion to the moral density of a society. Density can happen in three ways: through an increase of the spatial concentration of peoplethrough the growth of townsthrough an increase in the number and efficacy of the means of communication When one or more of these things happen, says Durkheim, labor begins to become divided, and jobs become more specialized. At the same time, because tasks grow more complex, the struggle for meaningful existence becomes more strenuous. A major theme of the book is the difference between developing and advanced civilizations and how they perceive social solidarity. Another focus is how each type of society defines the role of law in resolving breaches in that social solidarity. Social Solidarity Durkheim argues that two kinds of social solidarity exist: mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity connects the individual to society without any intermediary. That is, society is organized collectively and all members of the group share the same set of tasks and core beliefs. What binds the individual to society is what Durkheim calls the collective consciousness, sometimes translated as conscience collective, meaning a shared belief system. With organic solidarity, on the other hand, society is more complex, a system of different functions united by definite relationships. Each individual must have a distinct job or task and a personality that is their own. Here, Durkheim was speaking specifically about men. Of women, the philosopher said: Today, among cultivated people, the woman leads a completely different existence from that of man. One might say that the two great functions of the psychic life are thus dissociated, that one of the sexes takes care of the effective functions and the other of intellectual functions. Framing individuals as men, Durkheim argued that individuality grows as parts of society grow more complex. Thus, society becomes more efficient at moving in sync, yet at the same time, each of its parts has more movements that are distinctly individual. According to Durkheim, the more primitive a society is, the more it is characterized by mechanical solidarity. The members of an agrarian society, for example, are more likely to resemble each other and share the same beliefs and morals. As societies become more advanced and civilized, the individual members of those societies become more distinguishable from one another. People are managers or laborers, philosophers or farmers. Solidarity becomes more organic as those societies develop their divisions of labor. The Role of Law For Durkheim, the laws of a society are the most visible symbol of social solidarity and the organization of social life in its most precise and stable form. Law plays a part in a society that is analogous to the nervous system in organisms. The nervous system regulates various bodily functions so they work together in harmony. Likewise, the legal system regulates all the parts of society so that they work together in agreement. Two types of law are present in human societies and each corresponds to the type of social solidarity those societies use: repressive law and restitutive law. Repressive law corresponds to the center of common consciousness and everyone participates in judging and punishing the perpetrator. The severity of a crime is not measured necessarily as the damage incurred to an individual victim, but rather gauged as the damage it caused the society or the social order as a whole. Punishments for crimes against the collective are typically harsh. Repressive law, says Durkheim, is practiced in mechanical forms of society. Restitutive Law as Restoration The second type of law is restitutive law, which instead focuses on the victim since there are no commonly shared beliefs about what damages society. Restitutive law corresponds to the organic state of society and works through the more specialized bodies of society, such as the courts and lawyers. This also means that repressive law and restitutory law vary directly with the degree of a society’s development. Durkheim believed that repressive law is common in primitive, or mechanical, societies where sanctions for crimes are typically made and agreed upon by the whole community. In these lower societies, crimes against the individual do occur, but in terms of seriousness, those are placed on the lower end of the penal ladder. Crimes against the community take priority in such societies, according to Durkheim, because the evolution of the collective conscious is widespread and strong while the division of labor has not yet happened. The more a society becomes civilized and the division of labor is introduced, the more restitutory law takes place. Historical Context Durkheim wrote his book at the height of the industrial age. How people fit into Frances new social order surfaced as a principal source of trouble for the rapidly industrial society. The pre-industrial social groups comprised family and neighbors, but as the Industrial Revolution continued, people found new cohorts at their jobs, creating new social groups with co-workers. Dividing society into small labor-defined groups, says Durkheim, required an increasingly centralized authority to regulate relations between the different groups. As a visible extension of that state, law codes needed to evolve as well, to maintain the orderly operation of social relations by conciliation and civil law rather than by penal sanctions. Durkheim based his discussion of organic solidarity on a dispute he had with Herbert Spencer, who claimed that industrial solidarity is spontaneous and that there is no need for a coercive body to create or maintain it. Spencer believed that social harmony is simply established by itself, an idea with which Durkheim disagreed. Much of this book, then, involves Durkheim arguing with Spencer’s stance and pleading his own views on the topic. Criticism Durkheims primary objective was to evaluate the social changes related to industrialization and to better understand its ills. But British legal philosopher Michael Clarke argues that Durkheim fell short by lumping a variety of societies into two groups: industrialized and non-industrialized. Durkheim didnt see or acknowledge the wide range of non-industrialized societies, instead imagining industrialization as the historical watershed that separated goats from sheep. American scholar Eliot Freidson pointed out that theories about industrialization tend to define labor in terms of the material world of technology and production. Freidson says that such divisions are created by an administrative authority without consideration of the social interaction of its participants. American sociologist Robert Merton noted that as a positivist, Durkheim adopted the methods and criteria of the physical sciences to examine the social laws that arose during industrialization. But physical sciences, rooted in nature, simply cant explain the laws that have arisen from mechanization. The Division of Labor also has a gender problem, according to American sociologist Jennifer Lehman. She argues that Durkheims book contains sexist contradictions. Durkheim conceptualizes individuals as men but women as separate and nonsocial beings. By using this framework, the philosopher entirely missed out on the role of women have played in both industrial and pre-industrial societies. Sources Clarke, Michael. Durkheims Sociology of Law. British Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3, No. 2., Cardiff University,1976, Cardiff, Wales. Durkheim, Emile. On the Division of Labor in Society. Trans. Simpson, George. The MacMillan Company, 1933. New York.Freidson, Eliot. The Division of Labor as Social Interaction. Social Problems, Vol. 23 No. 3, Oxford University Press, 1976, Oxford, U.K.Gehlke, C. E. Reviewed Work: of  On the Division of Labor in Society, Emile Durkheim, George Simpson Columbia Law Review, 1935, New York.Jones, Robert Alun. Ambivalent Cartesians: Durkheim, Montesquieu, and Method. American Journal of Sociology, 1994, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Kemper, Theodore D. The Division of Labor: A Post–Durkheimian Analytical View. American Sociological Review, 1972, American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C.Lehmann, Jennifer M. Durkheims Theories of Deviance and Suicide: A Feminist Reconsideration. American Journal of Sociology, University of Chicag o Press, 1995, Chicago.Merton, Robert K. Durkheims Division of Labor in Society. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 40, No. 3, University of Chicago Press, 1934, Chicago.

Big Fat Tax Analysis Free Essays

In the article â€Å"Big fat tax is no gut buster† author Susie O’brien attacking the new tax on the fast food industry. By the opening slogan, â€Å"DON’T tax the big mac† she asserts her position on the tax. Written in bold the slogan immediately catches the eye and as it cleverly rhymes is very memorable. We will write a custom essay sample on Big Fat Tax Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now The author continues in cementing her standing on the issue by saying that a junk food tax is not the answer and the rhetorical question that, â€Å"why should reducing our weight start with our wallets? Her target audience with this piece would be those for the tax as she argues that there are downsides to a tax on fast food as well as alternatives that could be better. The image plastered in the centre of the article shows a man made of fast food. It relates to the subject of the article yet despite the amount of greasy fast food also seems appetising. The author also states that she is definitely for helping overweight Australians however that a fat tax is not the answer. We see colloquial language which creates a feeling of comfortability with the author when she states a fat tax is such a, â€Å"one-pronged solution† whilst also dismissing the idea as small-minded. The tone she has written in persuades readers to agree as she says, â€Å"it (government) can remove every damned junk food vending machines from gyms, sport club houses and schools. † The power in which the author says this makes her statement a real rallying point as if she is part of a protest. Whilst loaded language like â€Å"damned† and the rhetorical/loaded question of â€Å"why do so many parents reward kids for playing sport with a packet of chips? † This sentence gives readers who do this a sense of guilt whilst those who don’t may find it amusing. She then goes on to give the audience someone else to blame for their fat with the rhetorical question of, â€Å"Why not start by cracking down on irresponsible food labelling? She continues on with fact and research as she states that all our foods are, â€Å"choc-full of toxic ingredients like saturated fats, trans fats, palm oil and high-fructose corn syrup, which is one of the leading sweeteners in food, but is very hard for the body to effectively break down. † This makes the author seem knowledgeable on the subjects which can persuade readers into trusting her as she clearly knows what she’s talking about. The author gives many alternatives to a fat tax which seem simple to impose as well as logical to reducing obesity rates. The author proposes ideas such as setting up safer pedestrian walkways so that people (especially kids) may walk to places such as the local shops/schools. Inside these alternative solutions she can now turn it back on the fat tax by using loaded sentences such as, â€Å"Why does every social solution seem to involve taking money out of my pocket and putting it into Treasury? † as well as, â€Å"In short, if it (the government) wanted to, it could stop this problem in its tracks. But instead it’s being told merely to increase taxes. Talk about punishing the victim. † The author befriends her audience and makes it seem like she’s one of us/on our side so that it persuades readers to come round to her view. Her use of rhetorical questions makes readers come to assumptions that she wants them to. Whilst also giving them someone to blame in the government alluding that they are simply out for out money. Her powerful final sentence, â€Å"So let’s forget fads like tax on fast food, that will just make takeaways more expensive and will do nothing to change the way people live their lives. Let’s do more to change every single day to make life healthier for everyone. † leaves readers with a sense of duty and that the author’s aim is simply to help us, the people persuading us to be against the fat tax. Susie O’brien uses rhetorical questions and loaded language to coax readers into making assumptions about the government and the fat tax. Clever slogans and imagery helps her arguments be memorable as well as logical. She creates someone to blame as well as alternative solutions which makes a fat tax seem small-minded. This persuades readers to agree with her postion. How to cite Big Fat Tax Analysis, Papers

Origin Of Solar System Essays - Planetary Science, Solar System

Origin Of Solar System The Origin of the Solar System One of the most intriguing questions in astronomy today is the how our solar system formed. Not only does the answer add insight to other similarly forming systems, but also helps to satisfy our curiosity about the origin of our species. Although it is highly unlikely that astronomers will ever know with absolute scientific certainty how our system originated, they can construct similar theoretical models with the hopes gaining a better understanding. A basic understand of the current physical aspects of our solar system are helpful when trying to analyzing its origin. Our solar system is made of the Sun, nine major planets, at least sixty planetary satellite, thousands of asteroids and comets that all span an immense distance. Each planet has its own individual characteristics and seven of which have one or more satellites. There are thousands of asteroids, mainly congested in the area between Mars and Jupiter, as well as countless comets that all trav el in a spherical orbit around our Sun. The Sun contains approximately 99 percent of the mass in the solar system, but only 2 percent of the system's angular momentum. It lies in the center of our system while all planets, asteroids and alike rotate in elliptical orbits around it in the same plane. The smaller inner planets have solid surfaces, lack ring systems and have far fewer satellites then the outer planets. Atmospheres of most of the inner planets consist of large quantities of oxidized compounds such as carbon dioxide. While on the other hand, the outer planets are far more massive then the inner terrestrial planets, and have gigantic atmospheres composed mainly of hydrogen and helium. Asteroids and comets make up the smallest portion of the solar systems entities and are composed of the remnants left behind while planets were forming. For over 300 years, there has been a very long history of conjecture on the origin of the solar system. These many theories stem from two ge neral categories. The first category called monistic, involves the evolution of the Sun and planets as an isolated system. The second group of theories called dualistic, suggested that the solar system formed as a result of the interaction between two individual stars. The dualistic formation theory has been almost entirely dropped and monistic formation has become the general consensus on the basic formation of our solar system. Most modern theories of the origin of the solar system hypothesize that all bodies in the solar system, including the sun accreted from the formation and evolution of a single primordial solar nebula. It is believed that our solar system began to form around 4.56 billion years ago from a dense interstellar cloud of gas. Because of the conservation of angular momentum, the cloud of gas formed a rotating flattened disk approximately the size of the planetary system. It was this flattened disk that is referred to as the primitive solar nebula and from which ou r current solar system evolved. Ordinarily, the internal pressures of the cloud are sufficient to prevent if form collapsing. However, from time to time local increases in pressure of the interstellar medium cause the additional compression of interstellar clouds. These compressions caused the clouds to reach their threshold of gravitational collapse. Once the gravitational attraction of matter is greater then any tendency to expand due to internal pressures the cloud begins to collapse inward. Theoretical models suggest that the presolar nebula continued to collapse until the center of the cloud became so dense that heat started to form. This heat increased the thermal pressure of the cloud until the collapse was eventually halted. The existence of our system of planets is entirely due to the angular momentum of the initial cloud. If there were no angular momentum, then the interstellar cloud would have collapsed to from a single star. While at the same time, if the collapse had oc curred under a system with too much angular momentum then a binary star would have resulted from our system. Our system formed under intermediate conditions allowing the planets to evolve. The fact that the Sun contains 99 percent of the solar system's mass but only 2 percent